Block v. Sexton

577 N.W.2d 521 (1998)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Block v. Sexton

Minnesota Court of Appeals

577 N.W.2d 521 (1998)

Facts

Rita Sexton (defendant) owned an unimproved parcel of property that was formerly part of a farm owned by her parents. During the months of May to October each year, between 1941 and 1982, Sexton accessed the parcel from the highway via a field road that intersected with adjoining land owned by James and Florence Billig (defendants). The road was wide enough for cars, trucks, and farm machinery to pass through. Sometime prior to 1950, a gate was installed at one end of the road. Sexton continued to use the road despite the addition of the gate. In 1981, Billig also installed a lock, but informed Sexton she could still use the road. In 1992, Sexton planned to sell her parcel of land, notifying all prospective buyers that the property could be accessed from the highway via the road that intersected Billig’s land. Dean and Lisa Block (plaintiffs) subsequently purchased the land and claimed a prescriptive easement across Billig’s property based on Sexton’s prior use of the road. The district court determined that, although Sexton’s use of the road was sporadic, it was open, visible, continuous, and uncontested between 1941 and 1982, and suitable to the unimproved nature of the land. The court therefore concluded that the Blocks held a prescriptive easement, but limited such easement to use between May and October of each year and to a width of 20 feet. The Billigs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lansing, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership