Blondell v. Ahmed
North Carolina Court of Appeals
786 S.E.2d 405 (2016)
In March 2013, Shakil and Shabana Ahmed (defendants) signed an agreement with Colleen Blondell (plaintiff) giving Blondell the exclusive right to list the Ahmeds’ home. The agreement entitled Blondell to a real estate commission upon her sale of the home. On April 3, 2013, Michael and Susan Fekete made an offer on the home to Blondell. The Ahmeds rejected the offer. Later in April 2013, the Ahmeds told Blondell they no longer wished to sell their home. Accordingly, Blondell sent the Ahmeds an email with an unsigned termination agreement attached. The text of the email stated that the Ahmeds’ execution of the termination agreement would terminate the parties’ listing agreement. The termination agreement stated that it would become effective upon the signature of both parties. The Ahmeds signed the termination agreement and returned it to Blondell. On May 2, 2013, the Ahmeds reached an agreement with the Feketes to sell their home. Prior to signing a formal sale agreement, the Ahmeds contacted Blondell about the termination agreement. On May 10, 2013, Blondell signed the termination agreement. On May 11, 2013, the Ahmeds signed an agreement to sell the home to the Feketes. Blondell sued the Ahmeds for breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, seeking a real estate commission for the sale of the home. The Ahmeds argued that Blondell’s email rendered the listing agreement terminated upon the Ahmeds’ execution of the termination agreement. The trial court granted the Ahmeds’ motion for summary judgment. Blondell appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dillon, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.