Blue Cross Health Services, Inc. v. Sauer
Missouri Court of Appeals
800 S.W.2d 72 (1990)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
William R. Sauer (defendant) sought medical treatment at Missouri Baptist Hospital on June 6, 1984, where he claimed to have insurance coverage through Blue Cross Health Services, Inc. (Blue Cross) (plaintiff). Sauer did not have current coverage, and the hospital mistakenly associated him with William J. Sauer in their computer system, who did have insurance coverage through Blue Cross. The hospital changed the address of William J. Sauer to match the address given by William R. Sauer, which was the address of William R. Sauer’s father’s business. Subsequently, Blue Cross mistakenly mailed six checks intended for William J. Sauer to this new address. These checks totaled more than $22,000 and were cashed or deposited by William R. Sauer, his father, or his father’s business (defendants). Blue Cross eventually discovered the mistake and filed a suit in equity seeking a constructive trust upon the funds of the defendants based on unjust enrichment. Blue Cross originally sued William R. Sauer and his father’s business. Approximately three years after the original suit was filed, Blue Cross added the father as a defendant. The defendants moved for a transfer to a law division from the equity division and sought a jury trial. The trial court denied those motions and held a non-jury trial. The trial court entered judgment against the defendants. However, the trial court then granted a new trial, ruling that the defendants had been entitled to a jury trial. Blue Cross appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gaertner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.