Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
529 F.3d 417 (2008)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Blue Man Vegas, LLC (BMV) (defendant) produced Blue Man Group in Las Vegas. A seven-department stage crew assisted the Blue Men and musicians. The musical instrument technician (MIT) department differed from other crew departments because its members had specialized skills and cue tracks and interacted primarily only with musicians. “Swing” workers covered absent crew members as needed except MITs. For five years, the Luxor employed all crew except MITs. MITs reported to BMV’s production manager and signed in separately. BMV paid MITs salaries, whereas the Luxor paid crew hourly. The Luxor had a union collective-bargaining agreement covering only Luxor-employed crew members, not MITs. When BMV moved to the Venetian, BMV employed the entire stage crew directly. MITs continued reporting to BMV’s production manager, but other crew reported to department heads under a supervisor. BMV continued paying existing MITs salaries but paid new MITs hired at the Venetian and other crew members hourly. When the union petitioned for a representation election covering all crew members except MITs, BMV argued it should include them. The National Labor Relations Board found the differences between MITs and other crew members significant and ordered a representation election excluding MITs from the unit. After the union won the election, the board’s regional director complained that BMV refused to negotiate with the union. BMV countered that excluding the MITs made the bargaining unit inappropriate. The board ruled for the union, and BMV appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.