Blyth v. Birmingham Water Works
Court of Exchequer
156 Eng. Rep. 1047 (Ex. 1856)
Birmingham Water Works (Birmingham) (defendant) owned a nonprofit waterworks. Birmingham was tasked with laying water mains and fire plugs in the city streets according to statutory specifications. On February 24, 1855, a fire plug laid by Birmingham broke and allowed water to escape into the home of Blyth (plaintiff). The fire plug had worked well for twenty-five years. On the evening of the accident, the city experienced a severe frost, and the fire plug itself was covered with ice. Blyth sued Birmingham for damages. At trial, the trial judge stated that if Birmingham had removed the ice from the plug, the accident would not have occurred. However, he permitted the jury to consider whether Birmingham had exercised the proper level of care to prevent the accident. The jury returned a verdict for Blyth, and Birmingham appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Alderson, B.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.