BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P.

498 F.3d 1373 (2007)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
498 F.3d 1373 (2007)

Facts

BMC Resources, Inc. (BMC) (plaintiff) owned a United States patent that claimed a method of processing a complete payment transaction in a single telephone call. Claim 1 of BMC’s patent recited several steps, including prompting a caller to enter an account number associated with a payee, prompting the caller to enter a credit card or debit card number, accessing a remote payment network, and having the remote payment network determine whether sufficient funds exist in the caller’s account to complete the payment transaction. BMC sued Paymentech, L.P. (defendant) for infringement of its patent. BMC’s direct-infringement theory required four parties to perform all of the claimed method steps. Paymentech moved for a summary judgment of noninfringement on the ground that it did not perform all the steps of the claimed method, either by itself or in combination with other parties. The district court granted Paymentech’s motion. BMC appealed. On appeal, the parties agree that Paymentech did not perform every step of the claimed method, but BMC argued that a prior Federal Circuit decision had relaxed the standards for joint infringement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rader, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership