BMK Corp. v. Clayton Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
226 S.W.3d 179 (2007)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Jay-Max Sales (Jay-Max) was a distributor that supplied specialized foam to coal mines in the Colorado region. Jay-Max entered a contract with BMK Corporation (plaintiff) pursuant to which BMK agreed to supply Jay-Max with foam for a period of four years. BMK procured the foam from Clayton Corporation (defendant). BMK and Clayton entered a contract requiring Clayton to supply foam to BMK for four years and to refrain from selling foam to mines in the Colorado region. Clayton breached its agreement with BMK by selling foam directly to Colorado mines, and BMK sued, seeking the profits it would have made if Clayton had not breached the agreement. At trial, Jim Boehm, BMK’s chief financial officer, who was also a licensed CPA, testified extensively concerning his calculation of BMK’s lost profits, including explaining in detail the reasoning and assumptions underlying the calculation. Clayton subjected Boehm to rigorous cross-examination and presented its own expert testimony concerning BMK’s claim. The jury found for BMK and awarded $1 million in lost-profit damages. Clayton appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.