Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.

482 U.S. 569 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
482 U.S. 569 (1987)

Play video

Facts

In 1983, the Board of Airport Commissioners (board) (defendant) for the Los Angeles International Airport passed a resolution that prohibited “First Amendment activities by any individual and/or entity” in the Central Terminal Area of the airport. Violators were subject to legal action by the city under the resolution. In July 1984, Alan Howard Snyder, a minister for Jews for Jesus, Inc. (plaintiff), a nonprofit religious organization, was distributing free religious material in the Central Terminal Area when he was stopped by an airport peace officer. The officer showed Snyder the resolution, told him he was in violation, and asked him to leave or face legal action. Snyder complied. Jews for Jesus and Snyder then sued the board in the District Court for the Central District of California, claiming the resolution violated the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The district court held that the resolution was unconstitutional, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership