Board of County Commissioners v. Park County Sportsmen’s Ranch, LLP
Supreme Court of Colorado
45 P.3d 693 (2002)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
James Gardner and Amanda Woodbury (Landowners) (plaintiffs) owned property in South Park, Colorado. Park County Sportsmen’s Ranch, LLP (PCSR) also owned land in South Park. PCSR had an extensive plan for water use and management for its more than 2,000 acres of property. PCSR applied to the Water Court for a water-rights decree to implement this plan. As part of its application, PCSR claimed the right to use aquifers under the Landowners’ property as water-storage reservoirs. Aquifers are porous underground rock areas than can hold water. The Park County Board of County Commissioners (plaintiff) and the Landowners sued, claiming that PCSR had no right to use the space beneath the Landowners’ property for water storage. The Landowners claimed that, unless PCSR got the Landowners’ consent and paid for the use, storing PCSR’s water under the Landowners’ property was trespassing. The Landowners argued that they were entitled to the water and aquifers under their property, the same as they would be entitled to minerals under their property. The Water Court ruled that: (1) storing water under the Landowners’ property would not be a trespass and (2) because PCSR was not building anything on the Landowners’ property, PCSR’s proposal to store water under the Landowners’ property did not require either the Landowners’ consent or payment of just compensation to the Landowners. The Landowners appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hobbs, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Kourlis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.