Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz

United States Supreme Court
435 U.S. 78 (1978)


The University of Missouri-Kansas City Medical School (defendant) dismissed Ms. Horowitz (plaintiff) during her final year of study based on her failure to meet academic standards. Prior to her dismissal, Horowitz received low ratings for her clinical performance and was advanced to her final year only on a probationary basis. The faculty routinely expressed its dissatisfaction with Horowitz’s clinical skills and behavior. Based on these expressions of dissatisfaction and other critical evaluations, the Council of Evaluation (Council) recommended that she not be permitted to graduate, and that she be dismissed unless her performance improved. Seven practicing physicians and additional faculty then reviewed Horowitz. Based on the negative nature of these evaluations, the Council recommended her dismissal. Horowitz appealed in writing to the University’s Provost for Health Sciences. Upon reading the record of earlier proceedings, the Provost sustained the school’s actions. Horowitz sued the school under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arguing that she was not accorded procedural due process prior to dismissal. The district court dismissed Horowitz’s complaint which was reversed on appeal by a divided court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is for members only. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.


The issue section is for members only and includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

The holding and reasoning section is for members only and includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Here's why 10,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 7,722 briefs - keyed to 88 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now