Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Board of Directors of 175 East Delaware Place Homeowners Association v. Hinojosa

Illinois Court of Appeals
679 N.E.2d 407 (1997)


Facts

The Board of Directors of 175 East Delaware Place Homeowners Association (the Board) (plaintiff) adopted a rule banning dog ownership in the condominium building. Neither the declaration nor the bylaws of 175 East Delaware Place contained any provisions regarding pet ownership. The declaration, however, granted the Board the power to adopt reasonable rules for the maintenance of the property and the health and safety of the owners and residents. The Board adopted the dog prohibition after a dog was killed by another dog in the building. The residents in the building lived on floors 45 to 92. Nancy Carlson and Benjamin Tessler (defendants) purchased a condominium at 175 East Delaware Place and signed an agreement acknowledging the no-dog rule. Subsequently, Carlson and Tessler acquired a dog. The Board ordered them to get rid of the dog or be assessed fines. They did not get rid of the dog, and the Board began assessing fines. When Carlson and Tessler did not pay the fines, the Board filed a statutory lien on their unit. Carlson and Tessler then sold the unit to Jorge and Donna Hinojosa, subject to the lien. The Board filed suit to foreclose on the lien. The trial court found that the no-dog rule was unreasonable. The Board appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rakowski, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.