Board of Directors of 175 East Delaware Place Homeowners Association v. Hinojosa
Illinois Court of Appeals
287 Ill. App. 3d 886, 679 N.E.2d 407 (1997)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Board of Directors of 175 East Delaware Place Homeowners Association (the Board) (plaintiff) adopted a rule banning dog ownership in the condominium building. Neither the declaration nor the bylaws of 175 East Delaware Place contained any provisions regarding pet ownership. The declaration, however, granted the Board the power to adopt reasonable rules for the maintenance of the property and the health and safety of the owners and residents. The Board adopted the dog prohibition after a dog was killed by another dog in the building. The residents in the building lived on floors 45 to 92. Nancy Carlson and Benjamin Tessler (defendants) purchased a condominium at 175 East Delaware Place and signed an agreement acknowledging the no-dog rule. Subsequently, Carlson and Tessler acquired a dog. The Board ordered them to get rid of the dog or be assessed fines. They did not get rid of the dog, and the Board began assessing fines. When Carlson and Tessler did not pay the fines, the Board filed a statutory lien on their unit. Carlson and Tessler then sold the unit to Jorge and Donna Hinojosa, subject to the lien. The Board filed suit to foreclose on the lien. The trial court found that the no-dog rule was unreasonable. The Board appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rakowski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.