Board of Education of Minneapolis v. Hughes
Minnesota Supreme Court
136 N.W. 1095 (1912)
In May 1906, L.A. Hughes (defendant) bought a lot of land from Carrie Hoerger. Hughes sent his money and a deed to Hoerger with a copy of a deed to be executed and returned to him. The name of the grantee was left blank, but Hoerger signed and returned the deed. Hughes then filled his name in as grantee, and recorded the deed on December 16, 1910. In April 1909, Duryea & Wilson also received from Hoerger a quitclaim deed for the lot. This deed was recorded on December 21, 1910. On November 19, 1909, Duryea & Wilson conveyed the land to the Board of Education (plaintiff) by warranty deed, which deed was recorded on January 27, 1910. The Board of Education brought suit to determine who owned the title to the land. The trial court determined that the Board of Education was the proper owner. Hughes appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bunn, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.