Board of Education Township v. Climatemp

91 F.R.D. 245, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11092 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Board of Education Township v. Climatemp

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois
91 F.R.D. 245, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11092 (1981)

Facts

The attorney general for the state of Illinois and state’s attorney for Cook County, on behalf of the state of Illinois, the Chicago Board of Education, and Cook County (collectively, the state) (plaintiffs), filed an antitrust suit in state court against numerous sheet-metal construction companies (the construction companies) (defendants), alleging acts of bid-rigging and job allocation. The state alleged the construction companies to have conspired to restrain trade by sharing information about projects, allocating the projects among themselves, agreeing to submit low bid amounts, submitting insincere bids, and even refraining from bidding. Although the state did assert that their suit could be maintained as a class action on behalf of public entities within the state, the state did not move for certification as a class. The construction companies, however, filed a motion to strike the class-action assertions made by the state, arguing that the number of public entities that might have claims against the companies was not so numerous as to make other available methods of adjudication impracticable. The state objected, arguing that the class-action procedure was the only available method, and requested further discovery in order to ascertain the total number of entities with potential claims. Additional discovery was permitted and revealed the total number of public entities that might have claims to be 135.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leighton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership