Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
502 U.S. 32 (1991)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Under the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act of 1966, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the board) (defendant) could institute administrative proceedings against financial institutions and issue cease-and-desist orders. MCorp Financial, Incorporated (MCorp) (plaintiff) was a bank holding company. In 1988, the board instituted an administrative proceeding against MCorp pursuant to the board’s source-of-strength regulation. In 1989, the board instituted a second administrative proceeding against MCorp pursuant to § 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. Subsequently, MCorp filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions. Next, MCorp sued the board in the district court, arguing that the court ought to enjoin the two ongoing administrative proceedings because the filing of the bankruptcy petitions triggered an automatic stay as provided by the Bankruptcy Code. By this point, the board had issued only notices of charges and of hearing with respect to the two administrative proceedings and had not entered any orders or made any final decisions. Regardless, the district court entered a preliminary injunction enjoining the two proceedings. The board appealed to the court of appeals. The court of appeals held that the § 23A proceeding could go forward and that the source-of-strength proceeding must be enjoined because it exceeded the board’s statutory authority. The board appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.