Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina v. Helpingstine
United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
714 F. Supp. 167 (1989)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
The University of North Carolina (the university) (plaintiff) was a state-funded university with its main campus located in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Prior to 1982, the university made no attempt to license the manufacture and sale of items bearing the university’s name or logo. In 1982, however, the university registered four trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. These included the university’s seal, name, the letters “UNC,” and the tarheel foot logo. Charles Helpingstine (defendant) operated Johnny T-Shirt, a retail store that sold merchandise to the public. Johnny T-Shirt sold merchandise containing the university’s trademarks but did not have a license to do so. The university filed a lawsuit against Helpingstine, alleging trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. Helpingstine responded that the university had abandoned its trademark rights by not licensing them prior to 1982, or, in the alternative, that their use of the trademarks did not create the likelihood of confusion. Helpingstine also filed a counterclaim, alleging violations of the Sherman Act, among other things. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bullock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.