Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Board of Public Works v. L. Cosby Bernard and Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals
435 N.E.2d 575 (1982)


Facts

The Board of Public Works of Hammond, Indiana (Board) (defendant) hired L. Cosby Bernard and Co. (Cosby) (plaintiff) to design a building for the city. The architectural services contract provided that Cosby would receive a 6.5 percent commission on the total cost of construction, which was estimated to be $1.5 million. Cosby made preliminary drawings of the building and was paid for the work. The next step was for Cosby to complete final construction documents. The City Engineer, however, learned that federal funds might be available for the project and had Cosby design a fancier building with the advice of the City Engineer, the mayor, and various other officials. Because of the enhanced project design, however, Cosby submitted an additional claim that would have nearly doubled its fee. However, Cosby only received payment based on the original $1.5 million cost estimate. The City Controller refused to pay the additional amount because the Common Council had only appropriated enough funds to pay Cosby’s commission on the original $1.5 million construction estimate. Cosby sued. The parties disputed whether the Common Council and the Board knew about the project’s expansion or authorized the federal funding application. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Cosby on the basis that the contract obligated the city to pay the commission. The Board appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Conover, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.