Board of Supervisors of Augusta County v. Countryside Investment Company, L.C.
Virginia Supreme Court
258 Va. 497 (1999)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
The Board of Supervisors of Augusta County, Virginia (the board) (defendant) enacted a subdivision ordinance via the power granted to the board in the Virginia Land Subdivision and Development Act (the act). Section 21-6 of the ordinance made the size and shape of all proposed subdivision lots subject to the board’s approval. Section 21-7 of the ordinance allowed the board to deny a subdivision application if, in the board’s opinion, the proposed subdivision was not conducive to the preservation of a rural environment. Countryside Investment Company, L.C. (Countryside) (defendant) submitted a master plan for a proposed 427-lot subdivision that complied with the county’s minimum-lot-area requirement. However, the board denied approval of the master plan because (1) it did not include large lots of varying sizes and (2) it was inconsistent with the preservation of the area’s rural environment. Countryside sued, seeking judicial review of the board’s disapproval of the master plan. The circuit court found that §§ 21-6 and 21-7 of the subdivision ordinance exceeded the board’s statutory authority and ordered the board to approve the master plan. The board appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hassell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.