Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v. Massey

173 S.E.2d 869 (1970)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v. Massey

Virginia Supreme Court
173 S.E.2d 869 (1970)

SC

Facts

Fairfax County (the county) entered an agreement with other governments in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia to establish the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). WMATA was designed to provide mass-transit services for the counties and cities subject to the agreement. After the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the county’s guarantee of WMATA’s operating deficits constituted debt subject to the county’s constitutional debt limitation, the county amended its service agreement with WMATA. Under the new agreement, the county was required to make payments to WMATA pursuant to a formula based on the number of miles of the transit system in the county and the number of county residents who used the system. The county’s payments were conditioned on service being provided, and the county was no longer required to guarantee WMATA’s operating deficits. Despite the amended agreement, the same question was presented to the Virginia Supreme Court of whether the county’s payment obligation constituted a debt subject to its constitutional debt limit. The Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County argued that it did not.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (I’Anson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership