Board of Trustees of Compton Junior College District v. Stubblefield

94 Cal. Rptr. 318 (1971)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Board of Trustees of Compton Junior College District v. Stubblefield

California Court of Appeal
94 Cal. Rptr. 318 (1971)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Joseph Stubblefield (defendant) was a teacher employed with the Compton Junior College District (the district) (plaintiff). After a police officer found Stubblefield and a student engaging in a sexual act in his car, Stubblefield fled, knocking the officer to the ground and leading to a high-speed chase. Stubblefield was notified by the district that he would be terminated on the grounds that he had engaged in immoral conduct and was unfit to serve as a teacher, pursuant to California state law. After holding an informal hearing, the district requested a hearing before a superior court to determine whether the charges against Stubblefield were true and, if true, whether the charges were grounds for dismissal under state law. The superior court concluded that the charges were true and were grounds for dismissal. Stubblefield appealed the decision, arguing that his conduct did not constitute grounds for dismissal, because it was not immoral conduct or evidence that he was unfit to teach.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Compton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership