Quimbee logo with url
From our private database of 14,300+ case briefs...

Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. Goode

Arkansas Supreme Court
254 S.W. 345 (Ark. 1923)


Facts

The defendant conveyed a parcel of land to the plaintiff, but reserved the mineral rights under the surface of the land. Specifically, the deed read: “Reserving to the grantor, its successors and assigns, all of the gas, oil and minerals and mineral rights in and under said land, with the right to prospect for and exploit the same, and use sufficient surface therfor . . . .” Several years later, the plaintiff brought suit to cancel the reservation clause and quiet title, arguing that the reservation clause amounted to only a servitude. The chancery court found in favor of the plaintiff and ordered cancellation of the reservation clause. The defendant appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCulloch, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 257,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,300 briefs, keyed to 192 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.