Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Boehner v. McDermott

484 F.3d 573 (2007)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Boehner v. McDermott

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

484 F.3d 573 (2007)

Facts

John and Alice Martin used a police scanner to record a conference call between influential Republican politicians, including Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. The Martins could access the call because Representative John Boehner (plaintiff) joined the conversation from Florida using his cell phone. The recording captured a discussion about how to handle the upcoming announcement from the House Ethics Committee (Ethics Committee) about Gingrich’s agreement to accept a fine and reprimand as part of an Ethics Committee investigation. The Martins gave the recording in a sealed envelope to Representative James McDermott (defendant), a Democrat on the Ethics Committee. During a House recess, McDermott unsealed the envelope and listened to the recording. McDermott called reporters from two prominent newspapers, who came to his office, listened to the tapes, and made recordings for themselves to use in news articles. The tape’s content was newsworthy because it suggested Gingrich had gone against his agreement with the Ethics Committee. After the Martins identified McDermott as the representative to whom they gave the tape in a press conference, McDermott resigned from his position on the Ethics Committee. All Ethics Committee members were subject to a rule forbidding the disclosure to outside parties of any evidence related to an ethics investigation. McDermott agreed that punishment under the Ethics Committee rule did not offend his First Amendment rights. Boehner sued McDermott in federal court. The district court held that McDermott violated 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1)(c), a law criminalizing the intentional disclosure of illegally intercepted communication that the discloser had reason to know was illegally acquired. McDermott appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)

Concurrence (Griffith, J.)

Dissent (Sentelle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership