Boggs v. Peake

520 F.3d 1330 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Boggs v. Peake

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
520 F.3d 1330 (2008)

Facts

Clinton Boggs (plaintiff) served on active duty in the United States Army from 1950 to 1954, including combat service during the Korean War with an artillery unit. In 1955, Boggs filed a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant) for a service-connected disability for a left-ear condition. Boggs was diagnosed with conductive hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by problems in the outer or middle ear due to obstructions or infections. The VA denied a service connection because it found the condition began before Boggs’s military service. Decades later, Boggs was diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by acoustic trauma such as repeated exposure to loud noise, in the same ear. Boggs again filed for service-connected-disability benefits for hearing loss in his left ear, this time under this new diagnosis. After extensive procedures before the VA and the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board), his claim was denied. The issue eventually came before the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (the veterans court), which upheld the denial of benefits on the grounds that the claims should be considered the same because they involved the same symptomology. Boggs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gajarsa, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership