Quimbee logo with url
From our private database of 14,300+ case briefs...

Boisen v. Petersen Flying Service

Nebraska Supreme Court
383 N.W.2d 29 (1986)

Facts

Douglas Boisen (plaintiff) worked as a pilot for Petersen Flying Service (Petersen) (defendant), flying planes that sprayed agricultural chemicals on farms, for approximately one year. Before beginning his employment with Petersen, Boisen, received special training in how to use a spray plane. While working for Petersen, Boisen did not have any direct business contact with Petersen’s customers. Petersen did not have any trade secrets or keep a customer list. Any customer contact with Petersen was initiated by the prospective customers. As part of his employment, Boisen signed a covenant not to compete. After Petersen terminated Boisen’s employment, Boisen brought an action against Petersen for a declaration that the covenant not to compete was unenforceable. The district court found that the covenant not to compete was unreasonable and unenforceable, and Petersen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shanahan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 256,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,300 briefs, keyed to 191 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Here's why 256,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 14,300 briefs - keyed to 191 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.