From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Boisson v. Banian, Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
273 F.3d 262 (2001)
Judi Boisson (plaintiff) designed two quilts, School Days I and School Days II, that depicted the alphabet as capital letters and some pictures in square blocks. School Days I showed the alphabet in five horizontal rows, grouping letters in the rows as follows: A-E, F-J, K-O, P-T, U-Y, and Z, with four pictures. The pictures were a cat, a house, a single-starred American flag, and a basket. The letters were depicted in a variety of contrasting fabrics, with either solid colors or polka dots. Schools Days II used a different arrangement of the letters in red, white, and blue. Vijay Rao (defendant), president and owner of Banian, Limited (Banian) (defendant), imported three quilts from India that depicted the letters of the alphabet in square blocks. All the quilts, by both Boisson and Banian, used diamond stitching inside of the blocks, with wavy stitching around the borders. Banian’s three quilts were ABC Green Version I (Green I), ABC Green Version II (Green II), and ABC Navy. The coloring and pattern contrasting on 20 of the letters were essentially the same on School Days I, Green I, and Green II. The layout of the blocks on Green I and Green II were five horizontal rows of letters, also grouped A-E, F-J, K-O, P-T, U-Y, and Z with four pictures. The pictures in Green I were a cow, a sailboat, a bear, and a star. The pictures in Green II replaced Green I’s bear with a teddy bear in a flag vest. Boisson sued Rao and Banian for copyright infringement. The district court ruled that the Banian quilts were not substantially similar to Boisson’s quilts after a bench trial. The district court used a more discerning substantial-similarity test, because elements of the quilts were in the public domain, but the court’s analysis did not consider the arrangement of the elements in addition to the individual elements. Boisson appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cardamone, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 516,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 516,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.