Bolen v. Bolen
Kentucky Court of Appeals
169 S.W.3d 59 (2005)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Jackie Bolen (defendant) conveyed a property to Mabel Bolen, his sister; Andy Bolen (plaintiff), his sister’s husband; and Barbara Porter (plaintiff), his sister’s daughter, with rights of survivorship. A layperson prepared three documents related to the conveyance: a deed of conveyance, a consideration statement, and a sale-contract agreement. None of these documents expressly provided for retention of a lien or other security interest in the real property. Nor did any of these documents provide any details on default or failure to make monthly installment payments. At some point, Mabel and Andy died, so Barbara owned the property based on her rights of survivorship. Eventually, Barbara defaulted on the payments required and petitioned for bankruptcy. Barbara was discharged of all her personal debts. Later, Jackie sued Barbara for the balance due under the sale contract. The trial court found that Jackie’s interest in the property was not secured because he did not properly file a lien or other security interest with respect to the property. However, under its power to grant equitable relief, the trial court ordered that Barbara reconvey the property to Jackie. Barbara appealed, arguing that the trial court had no jurisdiction to order a reconveyance of the property because Jackie failed to retain a lien in the conveyance documents and Barbara had been discharged from liability due to her discharge in bankruptcy.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vanmeter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.