Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Bolotin v. Rindge

41 Cal. Rptr. 376 (1964)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

Bolotin v. Rindge

California District Court of Appeal, Second District

41 Cal. Rptr. 376 (1964)

Play video

Facts

In 1923, a tract of land in the Los Angeles neighborhood of Hancock Park was subdivided and subjected to deed restrictions. The restrictions required each lot to be used for a single private residence. Bolotin (plaintiff) owned an unimproved lot on the northeast corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Hudson Avenue. Rindge (defendant) owned property on the same street. The lots were subject to the deed restrictions. Wilshire Boulevard became more commercial over time. Bolotin sought to build a commercial building on his lot, and he sued for declaratory relief and to quiet title against the deed restrictions. The trial court found that due to Wilshire Boulevard’s changed character, Bolotin’s lot had no substantial value if used solely as a single-family residence. The court also found that failure to enforce the deed restrictions would not adversely affect the market value of the other lots in the tract. Accordingly, the court declared the deed restrictions to be unenforceable in part.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Files, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership