Bong v. Alfred S. Campbell Art Company

214 U.S. 236 (1909)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bong v. Alfred S. Campbell Art Company

United States Supreme Court
214 U.S. 236 (1909)

SH

Facts

Daniel Hernandez, a citizen of Peru, was the author of a painting entitled “Dolce Far Niente.” Hernandez assigned all rights in and to the painting to Rich Bong (plaintiff), a citizen of Germany. Alfred S. Campbell Art Co. (defendant), an American corporation, printed 1,000 copies of the painting, retitled as “Sunbeam.” Bong sued for infringement under the International Copyright Act of 1891. Notably, Germany granted the benefit of copyright to citizens of the United States on substantially the same basis as its own citizens, but Peru did not. The court of appeals affirmed the lower court’s ruling that Hernandez, being a citizen of Peru and not having the right of copyright in the United States, had no right of copyright to assign to Bong. Bong appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKenna, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership