Bonina v. Sheppard

78 N.E.3d 128 (2017)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bonina v. Sheppard

Massachusetts Appeals Court
78 N.E.3d 128 (2017)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Contractor Stephen Bonina (plaintiff) and Jane Sheppard (defendant) lived together, but never married. They bought a house in Sheppard’s name that needed significant repairs. Over the next 16 years, Bonina contributed $156,913.07 in costs plus his own labor improving and making additions and paid half the mortgage payments. When the couple split up, Bonina sued Sheppard to recover restitution, arguing his contributions unjustly enriched her. Bonina presented evidence substantiating everything he spent on permanent improvements, maintenance and repairs, and the mortgage but did not try to recover anything for the substantial amounts of labor he personally expended working on the house. The trial court found that Bonina never intended his contributions as gifts to Sheppard. Rather, the court found that Bonina’s mortgage payments covered the benefit of Bonina’s living in the home, and that Bonina had received the benefits of the maintenance and repairs. Neither party showed how much the improvements had increased the value of the home. As a result, the court awarded Bonina restitution of $156,913.07, representing the amount he spent on permanent improvements. Sheppard appealed, arguing Bonina was not entitled to restitution, or in the alternative, that the court should have measured restitution as the amount that the improvements increased the home’s value instead of costs.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kafker, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership