Bonner v. City of Prichard

661 F.2d 1206 (1981)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bonner v. City of Prichard

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
661 F.2d 1206 (1981)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit was established on October 1, 1981, through the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Reorganization Act of 1980 (the act). The former Fifth Circuit was divided into two new circuits, the Eleventh Circuit and the new Fifth Circuit. Section 9 of the act provided instructions for cases that had been filed with the former Fifth Circuit before the new circuits were established. Section 9(1) explained that if a case had been submitted for a decision, the case should proceed as if the act did not exist. Under that section, a case would be decided as if it were being decided by the former Fifth Circuit. Section 9(2) explained that if a case had not been submitted for a decision, the case should be transferred to the new court that it would have originated in under the act. Under that section, for example, a case that was still proceeding through court or on appeal in the Eleventh Circuit should be treated as if it had always been in the Eleventh Circuit. Larry Bonner (plaintiff) had been placed in the Prichard City Jail in Prichard, Alabama, while awaiting trial. Bonner filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the city of Prichard (defendant) alleging his constitutional rights had been violated while in jail. Bonner was released from jail before his case was heard, and the federal district court dismissed the case because Bonner was no longer in jail. Bonner appealed. In an earlier case, the former Fifth Circuit had held that a plaintiff’s case complaining about his treatment in a city jail could not be dismissed merely because the plaintiff was no longer in the jail. Bonner’s case had not been submitted for decision before the Eleventh Circuit was created and therefore fell under § 9(2) of the act. The Eleventh Circuit heard Bonner’s case en banc to determine whether the Eleventh Circuit should follow the precedents of the former Fifth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Godbold, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership