Booker v. Duke Medical Center

256 S.E.2d 189 (1979)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Booker v. Duke Medical Center

North Carolina Supreme Court
256 S.E.2d 189 (1979)

Facts

Duke Medical Center (Duke) (defendant) employed Robert Booker as a laboratory technician to analyze blood samples in Duke’s clinical chemistry laboratory. Some of the samples Booker analyzed were infected with serum hepatitis, a liver disease contractable by direct contact with infected blood. Booker liked to garden and occasionally came to work with unhealed cuts on his hands. Although Booker was careful while analyzing blood samples, he regularly spilled blood on his fingers. In July of 1971, Booker was diagnosed with serum hepatitis. Booker subsequently died from the disease, and his dependents (plaintiffs) sought workers’-compensation death benefits from Duke. In proceedings on the benefits application, the head of the laboratory testified that Booker had handled many blood samples containing hepatitis and that Booker likely had not been exposed to hepatitis anywhere other than at Duke. Two other doctors testified that laboratory technicians in large clinical laboratories faced a greater likelihood of contracting serum hepatitis than other hospital employees or the general public. The North Carolina Industrial Commission awarded benefits to Booker’s dependents, but the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed. The court held, among other things, that serum hepatitis was not a compensable occupational disease under North Carolina’s workers’-compensation statute. Booker’s dependents appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sharp, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership