Boone v. Coe

154 S.W. 900 (1913)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Boone v. Coe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
154 S.W. 900 (1913)

SC
Play video

Facts

J.F. Coe (Coe) (defendant) entered into a verbal contract with W.H. Boone and J.T. Coe (Boone) (plaintiffs). Under the contract, Coe would lease his farm to Boone for a period of one year, starting whenever they arrived at the farm. Coe said that he would have a house ready for Boone to live in and would furnish supplies for them to build a barn. In exchange, Boone was to cultivate certain portions of the farm for the year. When Boone arrived at the farm, the house was not ready to be inhabited and supplies for the barn were not there. Boone brought suit, seeking damages for the cost and time it took to travel from their former home in Kentucky to the farm in Texas, as well as the cost of giving up their home and business in Kentucky. The trial court found in favor of Coe because the oral agreement fell within the statute of frauds and was unenforceable. Boone appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clay, C.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership