United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
68 F.3d 597 (1995)
Borawick (plaintiff) underwent hypnosis sessions to treat her panic attacks and physical illness. While under hypnosis, Borawick recollected having been sexually abused as a child by Christine and Morrie Shay (defendants). Borawick sued the Shays for damages. Pretrial evidence showed: (1) the hypnotist had no formal training in psychiatry or psychology, (2) there was no permanent record of the procedures the hypnotist followed, (3) the hypnotist’s only recollection of Borawick's treatment was based on her deposition, and (4) Borawick made uncorroborated accusations of childhood sexual abuse against other individuals. The trial judge granted the Shays' motion in limine to exclude Borawick's testimony based on her hypnotically-induced recollections. Borawick appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.