Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Bordenkircher v. Hayes

United States Supreme Court
434 U.S. 357 (1978)


 

Facts

Paul Lewis Hayes (defendant) was indicted on a charge of uttering a forged instrument in the amount of $88.30, punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment. Thereafter, Hayes and his attorney met with the prosecutor to discuss a possible plea agreement. The prosecutor offered Hayes a sentence of five years in prison if he pled guilty to the uttering charge and “saved the court the inconvenience and necessity of a trial.” However, if Hayes chose not to plead guilty the prosecutor would go back to the grand jury and re-indict Hayes as a habitual offender, subjecting him to a possible mandatory term of life imprisonment due to Hayes’ two previous felony convictions. Hayes chose not to plead guilty and the prosecutor obtained an indictment charging him under the state’s Habitual Criminal Act. Hayes was subsequently found guilty of the uttering offense and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence. Hayes then filed a petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus. The court of appeals held that the prosecutor’s conduct during the plea negotiations had violated the principles which “protected defendants from the vindictive exercise of a prosecutor’s discretion,” and ordered Hayes’ sentence to be reduced to a lawful sentence imposed only for the uttering crime. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

Dissent (Powell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


How much leverage does a prosecutor have in pleas bargaining attempted murder?

The defendant wanted to kill Bill Gates and used a bomb. The bomb did not explode. The defendant was charged with attempted murder. What is a good plea bargain in the state of California.

Want to see this answer?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and get access to all answers in our Q&A database

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Tempor minim nulla id mollit ullamco consequat aliquip adipisicing irure officia tempor. Magna sit eiusmod laborum proident laboris ex sunt. Non labore ex officia irure qui et laboris aliqua in minim. Labore velit aliqua proident officia cillum occaecat dolore tempor. Ullamco in consequat labore amet laborum proident reprehenderit anim cillum excepteur. Elit do nostrud nisi excepteur sit dolor pariatur fugiat. Nisi incididunt incididunt do est velit excepteur enim excepteur incididunt mollit pariatur. Irure tempor non in esse do. Laboris eiusmod in ad ut enim est duis ad sint veniam eiusmod.