Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Bordenkircher v. Hayes

United States Supreme Court
434 U.S. 357 (1978)


Facts

Paul Lewis Hayes (defendant) was indicted on a charge of uttering a forged instrument in the amount of $88.30, punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment. Thereafter, Hayes and his attorney met with the prosecutor to discuss a possible plea agreement. The prosecutor offered Hayes a sentence of five years in prison if he pled guilty to the uttering charge and “saved the court the inconvenience and necessity of a trial.”  However, if Hayes chose not to plead guilty the prosecutor would go back to the grand jury and re-indict Hayes as a habitual offender, subjecting him to a possible mandatory term of life imprisonment due to Hayes’ two previous felony convictions. Hayes chose not to plead guilty and the prosecutor obtained an indictment charging him under the state’s Habitual Criminal Act. Hayes was subsequently found guilty of the uttering offense and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence. Hayes then filed a petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus. The court of appeals held that the prosecutor’s conduct during the plea negotiations had violated the principles which “protected defendants from the vindictive exercise of a prosecutor’s discretion,” and ordered Hayes’ sentence to be reduced to a lawful sentence imposed only for the uttering crime. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Powell, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.