Bordes v. Bordes
Louisiana Supreme Court
730 So. 2d 443 (1999)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Gary Bordes (defendant) married Roselyn Bordes (plaintiff) in 1981. In 1994, at the age of 42, Gary became totally disabled. By the time Gary became disabled, he had been working for the Water Department of Jefferson Parish for over 20 years and was eligible to receive disability retirement benefits from the Parochial Employees’ Retirement System of Louisiana (PERS) until he reached full retirement age. The PERS disability-benefits policy had no cash value, and Gary was able to obtain benefits under the policy only because he became disabled. To remain eligible for disability benefits, Gary was required to submit to periodic medical examinations to confirm he remained disabled and unable to engage in gainful employment. When Gary reached full retirement age, which PERS defined as age 60, his disability retirement benefits would convert to normal retirement benefits. In 1995, Roselyn filed for divorce. All issues were settled before trial except for the classification of Gary’s disability benefits, which Roselyn argued should be classified as community property. The trial court held that Gary’s disability benefits were community property because they were a substitute for retirement benefits. The appellate court affirmed. Gary then appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the disability benefits were his separate property.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.