Boree v. Commissioner

837 F.3d 1093 (2016)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Boree v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
837 F.3d 1093 (2016)

Facts

In 2002, Gregory Boree, doing business as Glen Forest, LLC, purchased 1,892 acres of land in Baker County, Florida, for $965 per acre. Glen Forest submitted a residential-development plan called West Glen Estates (West Glen) to the county. The plan called for over 100 lots to be developed and sold in phases. The county approved the plan and rezoned the property into 10-acre lots. Between 2002 and 2006, Glen Forest sold approximately 60 perimeter lots (about 600 acres) and engaged in substantial development activity. From late 2004 through early 2006, the county imposed several land-use restrictions affecting West Glen, including requirements to pave certain subdivision and county roads. Compliance would have cost Glen Forest over $11.4 million. After failing to obtain an exception, Glen Forest hired an attorney and applied to rezone the property for higher-density residential and commercial use. In early 2006, Boree began negotiating the sale of 1,067 acres of the West Glen property to Adrian Development (Adrian). In August 2006, the county approved Glen Forest’s rezoning request. However, Glen Forest withdrew the proposal and instead applied to rezone the property into 7.5-acre lots. The sale to Adrian closed in February 2007 for approximately $9,500 per acre. A week later, Glen Forest withdrew its remaining rezoning application. Boree reported the gain from the sale as capital gain on his 2007 tax return. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed a deficiency, reclassifying the gain as ordinary income. Boree petitioned the tax court for a redetermination, arguing that he had purchased the property to hold as an investment and had segregated and sold perimeter lots only to pay off debts. The tax court found that Boree intended to develop and sell the property in the ordinary course of business, and it upheld the IRS’s determination. Boree appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Coogler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership