Borg-Warner Protective Services v. Flores
Texas Court of Appeals
955 S.W.2d 861 (1997)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Amelia Flores (plaintiff) worked as a security guard for Borg-Warner Protective Services Corporation (Borg-Warner) (defendant). Flores was assigned to a small field office. The guard staff’s supervisor, Santiago “Jimmy” Gonzalez (defendant), repeatedly subjected Flores and other female guards to sexual harassment. Flores knew of one instance in which a female guard named Garcia reported a harassment incident to Borg-Warner managers, who took no action in response. Gonzalez’s harassment of Flores culminated in a rape during business hours. Gonzalez forbade Flores from telling other Borg-Warner supervisors about the incident. Nevertheless, through indirect channels, word of the rape reached Borg-Warner a few weeks later. Borg-Warner informed Flores that Gonzalez had been placed immediately on administrative leave and offered Flores a few days off. Instead, Flores resigned. Flores sued Borg-Warner on tort charges and for violating a Texas sexual-harassment law modeled after Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. The trial jury found that Borg-Warner had constructively discharged Flores and awarded Flores actual and punitive damages, to which the trial court added enhanced attorney’s fees. Borg-Warner appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chavez, J.)
Dissent (Seerden, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.