Boring v. Buncombe County Board of Education

136 F.3d 364 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Boring v. Buncombe County Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
136 F.3d 364 (1998)

Facts

Margaret Boring (plaintiff) was a teacher at a public high school. Boring selected a play for four of her students to perform in theater competitions with other schools. The play contained mature subject matter. The students won several awards at a regional competition. Before the students participated in the state-level competition, Boring sent Fred Ivey, the school’s principal, a copy of the play’s script. Ivey took issue with the selection of the play but allowed the students to continue competing after making certain deletions from the text. At the end of the school year, Ivey sought a school transfer for Boring, which the school district (defendant) granted. Boring sued the district, alleging that her transfer was punishment for her selection of the play and, thus, that the transfer violated her free-speech rights under the First Amendment. The district court ruled in favor of the school district, and Boring appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Widener, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership