Borkowski v. Valley Central School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
63 F.3d 131 (1995)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Kathleen Borkowski (plaintiff) suffered head trauma and severe neurological damages from a motor-vehicle accident. Borkowski recovered but still experienced difficulties with memory, concentration, mobility, and coordination. Borkowski applied to be a library teacher in Valley Central School District (Valley Central) (defendant), responsible for maintenance of the library and teaching library skills to elementary classes. Valley Central hired Borkowski as a probationary teacher in accordance with state law, and Borkowski was evaluated over the course of three years, with future employment and tenure dependent on the evaluation results. The evaluators noted that Borkowski struggled with classroom management in her teaching assignments. Borkowski was denied future employment and filed suit in federal district court, claiming that Valley Central violated the Rehabilitation Act by discriminating against her for her disability. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Valley Central, and Borkowski appealed to the Second Circuit, claiming that with the reasonable accommodation of a teacher’s aide in class, she could sufficiently perform the functions of the library-teacher job.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Calabresi, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.