Borough of Palmyra Board of Education v. F.C.

2 F. Supp. 2d 637 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Borough of Palmyra Board of Education v. F.C.

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
2 F. Supp. 2d 637 (1998)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

F.C. (plaintiff) was a 15-year-old student who suffered from severe mental-health conditions and required special education services. F.C.’s school district, the Borough of Palmyra Board of Education (the board) (defendant) allegedly provided an inadequate and ineffective educational plan for F.C. at his public school. F.C.’s parents (the parents) (plaintiffs) initiated an administrative hearing against the board. An administrative-law judge (ALJ) determined that, under the Rehabilitation Act, the board’s plan was “seriously deficient” and the parents were entitled to place F.C. at a private school for educationally handicapped children. The ALJ ordered the board to pay the costs associated with F.C.’s private-school placement. The board failed to comply with the ALJ’s order and appealed the decision to district court. In district court, the parents moved for a preliminary injunction requiring the board to pay for F.C.’s tuition and transportation costs. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 65(c), the parents were required to post a security bond to support the issuance of a preliminary injunction, but the parents could not afford to do so. The court found that the parents were entitled to a preliminary injunction and had to consider whether the parents were required to provide security.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Simandle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership