Boston University Chapter v. N.L.R.B.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
835 F.2d 399 (1987)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
In 1974 the Boston University Chapter, American Association of University Professors (the union) (plaintiff) filed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (defendant) to certify a bargaining unit composed of all regular full-time faculty members at Boston University (BU). The certification was requested pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act (the act). Managerial employees had been excluded from the act by a judicial decision of the United States Supreme Court. BU objected to the petition, claiming that full-time faculty were managerial employees and thereby excluded from the act’s coverage. After a vote in favor of certification, the union was certified by the NLRB. However, the union’s request for bargaining was rejected by BU. Subsequently, the union filed an unfair-labor-practice charge against BU, alleging violations of the act. The NLRB agreed with the union, and it ordered BU to collectively bargain. BU appealed, and the NLRB’s decision was affirmed. While BU’s petition to the United States Supreme Court was pending, the Supreme Court decided N.L.R.B. v. Yeshiva University, a similar case, holding that full-time university faculty, under certain circumstances, are managerial employees under the act. Subsequently, on petition from BU, the case was remanded to the NLRB for further consideration in light of Yeshiva. On remand, an administrative-law judge (ALJ) made findings of fact regarding the responsibilities of full-time faculty and determined that, based on the Yeshiva ruling, they were managerial employees. The NLRB affirmed the recommended ruling and issued an order dismissing the charge against BU. The union appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.