Botiller v. Dominguez

130 U.S. 238 (1889)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Botiller v. Dominguez

United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 238 (1889)

Facts

At the end of the war with Mexico, the United States gained land formerly owned by Mexico through a peace treaty, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The land that comprises California was transferred under this treaty, which also sought to protect the property owned by Mexican citizens prior to the treaty. Subsequently, the Act of Congress of March 3, 1851, established the California Land Claims Commission to determine the validity of private land claims in the state, including the claims of Mexican citizens whose lands had been granted by the Mexican government before the peace treaty. More than 40 years after the Land Claims Commission was established, some private landowners had still not presented their claims to the commission to have their ownership confirmed. Dominga Dominguez (defendant) was a private landowner who claimed that title to his land, Rancho Las Virgenes, was granted to him by the Mexican government. Dominguez attempted to eject another, Brigido Botiller (plaintiff), from his land; however, he had never submitted his claim to the commission to establish his ownership. The California Supreme Court decided that the act that created the commission was invalid. It reasoned that the California Land Claims Commission had no jurisdiction to determine the validity of titles to private land that had been established by the government of Mexico prior to the land being transferred to the United States. The United States Supreme Court considered the validity of the lower court’s decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership