Bourdeau Brothers v. ITC
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
444 F.3d 1317 (2006)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Deere & Company (plaintiff) manufactured forage harvesters in both the United States and Europe. Some of the harvesters manufactured in the United States were intended solely for sale in Europe. The European and North American harvesters were not identical but contained differences, including the lighting configurations, warning labels, and safety decals. Further, the hitch mechanism on the European harvester was not compatible with North American wagons. Finally, the user manual of the American model was in English, but the manuals of the European model were in the language of the target country. Bourdeau Brothers, Inc. (defendant) imported some of Deere’s European harvesters for sale in the United States. Deere filed a claim with the International Trade Commission (the commission), asserting that the importation rendered the European harvesters gray-market goods, also known as gray goods, in violation of Deere’s trademark. The commission ruled in favor of Deere. Bourdeau appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clevenger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.