Bove v. Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
258 N.Y.S. 229 (1932)
- Written by Anjali Bhat, JD
Facts
In 1910, Antonia Bove (plaintiff) purchased two lots in a commercial and industrial area of Buffalo, New York, and built a house to use as a grocery store, a personal residence, and rental apartments. Across the street from Bove, Donner-Hanna Coke Corporation (Donner-Hanna) (defendant) operated a coke oven from which clouds of steam, dust, and soot emanated. Although Donner-Hanna had moved into that location after Bove moved into her house, the area was already an industrial area by the time Bove purchased her lots, and there were already eight industrial plants within a one-mile radius of Bove’s house. Further, in 1925, the City of Buffalo passed an ordinance zoning the area as permissible for industrial use, specifically including coke ovens. Bove brought suit for injunctive relief and damages, arguing that Donner-Hanna’s oven had caused Bove severe headaches, injured her and her family’s health, and reduced the rental value of her property, making it at times impossible to rent out the apartments. Bove argued that the use of the oven had deprived Bove of her property rights and constituted a private nuisance. The trial court rejected Bove’s argument, and Bove appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Edgcomb, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.