Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Bowmer v. Bowmer

50 N.Y.2d 288, 406 N.E.2d 760 (1980)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Bowmer v. Bowmer

New York Court of Appeals

50 N.Y.2d 288, 406 N.E.2d 760 (1980)

Facts

John and Dorothy Bowmer entered into a separation agreement that provided for John’s alimony and child-support payments using a specific formula. The agreement included an arbitration clause stating that any claim arising from the agreement, any payment default by John, or any matter made arbitrable by the agreement would be arbitrated. Several provisions in the agreement designated specific matters, but not modifications to the support formula, as arbitrable. Instead, the support provisions were detailed and specific, with flexibility built into the formula itself to account for changes in John’s circumstances. John notified Dorothy that he would be reducing his support payments due to changed circumstances at home. Dorothy refused to agree and further refused to arbitrate the question of whether John could alter his payment formula. John still made the payment adjustment, and Dorothy invoked the arbitration clause to compel his formulated payment. John then filed suit in New York state court to stay the arbitration that Dorothy had commenced and to compel arbitration on the issue of whether he could modify his payment obligations using the steps he had taken. The trial court ruled in favor of John, and Dorothy appealed. The appellate court modified the trial court’s ruling, finding that the issue of payment reductions was nonarbitrable. John appealed to the New York Court of Appeals, claiming that under the separation agreement, an arbitrator had the power to modify John’s support obligations.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fuchsberg, J.)

Dissent (Gabrielli, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership