Box v. South Georgia Railway Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
433 F.2d 89 (1970)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
Guardian Mary Lee Box (plaintiff) filed a wrongful-death action on behalf of decedent Josie Ellis’s four minor children. One day Josie Ellis, who was deaf, was struck and killed by a train owned by South Georgia Railway Company (South Georgia) (defendant) as she walked along the train track with the train approaching. The crew blew the train’s whistle, and a brakeman later testified that Ellis looked back and continued walking on the tracks. Then the brakemen yelled to Ellis, but she did not move. Despite application of the train’s brakes, the train struck Ellis and killed her instantly. Ellis did not attempt to step off the tracks. Despite the brakeman’s testimony that Ellis looked back, she never saw the train coming and could not hear the train’s whistle or the shouting from the crew due to her physical disability, unbeknownst to the train’s crew. The record indicated that the train was traveling at a reasonable speed and gave appropriate warnings, and that the crew was properly observing the upcoming crossing area where Ellis was struck. When the crew realized that Ellis would not move, they acted immediately, but it was too late. Box’s first suit ended in a mistrial. At the second trial, the jury considered issues such as negligence and contributory negligence. South Georgia moved for a directed verdict, which was denied. The jury rendered a verdict for Box, and South Georgia moved for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict (n.o.v.) and for a new trial, which were also denied. South Georgia appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.