Boyce v. Amerihome, Inc. and Planetary Bank N.A.

366 E.W.3d 489 (2014)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Boyce v. Amerihome, Inc. and Planetary Bank N.A.

Supreme Court of Erehwon
366 E.W.3d 489 (2014)

SC

Facts

Ned and Charlotte Boyce (defendants) obtained a mortgage from Wonder Mortgage Company. Wonder sold the loan to Maximum Finance Company. Maximum then sold the loan into a securitization of which Planetary Bank N.A. (plaintiff) was the trustee. A pooling service agreement (PSA) governed the securitization. The Boyces’ initial interest rate was 6.3 percent, fixed for two years. Beginning in the third year, the rate was adjustable based on the U.S. Treasury’s one-year Treasury index (the index). At the time, the index was 5.05 percent. Freddie Farmer, the mortgage broker, told the Boyces that their interest rate would increase only if the index increased. However, the promissory note actually stated the rate would be calculated each year by adding seven percentage points to the then-current index and rounding up to the nearest one-fourth of a percentage point. At the time of the Boyces’ first rate adjustment, the index was 0.62 percent, making the Boyces’ new interest rate 7.75 percent. The Boyces defaulted and Amerihome, Inc. (plaintiff), Planetary’s servicer, commenced foreclosure proceedings. The Boyces argued Farmer committed fraud by misrepresenting the nature of the Boyces’ adjustable interest rate. Despite what Farmer told them, the interest rate would increase after the first two years regardless of the index. The Boyces also argued Amerihome breached the PSA, a fact that Amerihome conceded. The Boyces claimed the breach voided the transfer to Planetary. The trial court denied the Boyces’ motion for summary judgment. The Boyces appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nonymous, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership