Boyette v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
954 S.W.2d 350 (1997)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Joseph Rutherford and three co-workers flew on Trans World Express (TWE) from Memphis, Tennessee to Sioux City, Iowa, with a layover in St. Louis, Missouri. Prior to and during the flight to St. Louis, Rutherford consumed several alcoholic drinks and became intoxicated. After deplaning onto the tarmac in St. Louis, Rutherford passed under a yellow rope marking a restricted area and climbed onto an idling luggage tug. Britney Callier, a TWE gate agent, radioed for assistance from airport security. Upon hearing that airport security had been summoned, Rutherford climbed down and made his way into the terminal where he stole a golf cart and began driving around the gate area. Callier chased Rutherford on foot and cornered him in an alcove. Rutherford eluded Callier by going through an unlocked cleaning room. The room had a small door leading to a trash chute that was connected to a trash compactor ten feet below. Once the weight of the trash was detected by the machine it crushed, or compacted, the material. Rutherford fell down the trash chute, into the trash compactor, and was subsequently crushed and killed. Patricia Boyette (plaintiff), mother of Rutherford, filed a wrongful-death suit against Callier, TWE, and its parent company, Trans World Airlines, Inc. (defendants). Boyette argued that the defendants acted negligently when Callier chased Rutherford through the concourse. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Boyette appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pudlowski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.