Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Boyle v. Petrie Stores Corp.

Supreme Court of New York
518 N.Y.S.2d 854 (1985)


Facts

Michael Boyle (plaintiff) entered into a contract, negotiated by attorneys for both parties, with Petrie Stores Corporation (Petrie Stores) (defendant). Under the contract, Boyle would become Petrie Stores’ president and chief executive officer (CEO) on November 1, 1982. Boyle would remain in this position for five years and was giving up a well-paid position elsewhere to take this job. As president and CEO, Boyle would be subject to the control of the board of directors (Board) but have general supervision over the business. The contract provided that in the event of a breach by Petrie Stores, including termination other than for a material breach or just cause, Boyle would be entitled to over $2,100,000, excluding stock options, in liquidated damages. This amount did not exceed the total compensation provided for in the five-year contract. Milton Petrie, who was the Board chairman and prior CEO, had a reputation for being temperamental. On January 13, 1983, after Boyle had served two months of his five-year contract, the Board acceded to Milton’s demand that Boyle be fired after Milton and Boyle had a heated argument. Boyle then took up another position elsewhere but sued Petrie Stores, seeking liquidated damages per the contract. Petrie Stores countered that the liquidated damages sought by Boyle were an unconscionable penalty and therefore inappropriate.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Greenfield, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.