Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Boyle v. United Kingdom

47 Eur. Hum. Rgt. Rptr. 19 (2008)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...

Boyle v. United Kingdom

European Court of Human Rights

47 Eur. Hum. Rgt. Rptr. 19 (2008)

Facts

John Boyle (defendant) and two other soldiers in the British Army were accused of rape. The commander of Boyle’s unit charged Boyle and referred his case to a higher authority. Under the applicable rules, the higher authority could still remand the case back to the commander for prosecution at a later time. The unit commander then ordered Boyle held on close arrest, i.e., detainment in a locked facility, pending trial. Boyle was detained in a military correctional facility for the next two months without being given an attorney or documents showing the reasons for his continued detainment. Boyle’s family finally hired a private attorney who pushed for Boyle’s release into open arrest, i.e., a release back into a military unit, until his trial. Approximately one month later, the correctional-facility commander released Boyle into a military unit pending trial. Boyle and his codefendants were tried two months later and were acquitted of the charges. Boyle brought charges alleging that his pretrial detainment violated the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, more commonly known as the European Convention on Human Rights (convention). Specifically, Boyle alleged a violation of Article 5, § 3 of the convention on the grounds that his unit commander had not been sufficiently impartial to make the judicial decision to order the close arrest. Boyle argued that the unit commander could not have been impartial because the commander (1) had a prosecutorial role in the case and (2) had been responsible for discipline in Boyle’s unit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 583,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 583,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 583,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 32,100 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership