Boyles v. Hausmann

517 N.W.2d 610 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Boyles v. Hausmann

Nebraska Supreme Court
517 N.W.2d 610 (1994)

SC

Facts

In 1977, Larry and Olga Boyles (plaintiffs) bought property in a subdivision subject to a number of restrictive covenants, including building-size limits and a prohibition on the construction of a house on any lot smaller than the original plotted number. There were no covenants regarding setbacks or the location of buildings on properties. The subdivision’s declaration of covenants stated that beginning in 1983, the residents of the subdivision could change the restrictive covenants in whole or in part by majority vote. In 1990, the residents voted to change the covenants to include a prohibition on construction of any buildings with 120 feet of a nearby road. The Boyleses did not agree to this new restriction and brought suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the new restriction was invalid. The district court upheld the restriction. The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed, invalidating the restriction. The Boyleses appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership